Brantford Mayor Kevin Davis is pressing forward with plans for an independent study into the potential amalgamation of Brantford and the County of Brant, despite strong opposition from County officials. Davis maintains that evaluating the financial and operational implications of a merger is critical for regional growth and efficiency.
In response to Davis’ January 2, 2025, statement calling for a study, Brant County Mayor David Bailey issued a firm rebuttal the following day, reiterating the County’s unwavering opposition to amalgamation. Bailey described Davis’ tactics as “unproductive and misguided,” asserting that there is nothing collaborative about the approach proposed by Brantford’s mayor.
Bailey emphasized that the County is a “prosperous, growing and thriving community” and criticized Davis’ claims as factually incorrect or blatantly false. Bailey argued that Brant has a proven record of successful partnerships with Brantford, adding that any new ventures must be rooted in mutual respect, common interest, and cost-effectiveness.
Bailey specifically rejected Davis’ assertion that Brant had been uncooperative in joint service discussions, calling such claims “categorically false.” He pointed to the County’s willingness to engage in shared initiatives where benefits are balanced, accusing Davis of attempting to strong-arm the County into broader discussions without proper consideration.
The County’s statement further underscored that amalgamation is a complex process requiring provincial oversight and cooperation between municipalities. Bailey suggested that instead of focusing on amalgamation, Davis should prioritize improving shared services that already exist, particularly in areas requiring immediate attention.
Davis, however, remains committed to moving forward. He announced plans to use his strong mayoral powers to commission a fact-based study in 2025, which will examine costs, service efficiencies, and long-term sustainability. He stressed that the study aims to provide data for informed decision-making rather than forcing a merger.
“This isn’t about taking anything away from Brant. It’s about building something better for all of us,” Davis said, underscoring the importance of exploring regional solutions to shared challenges.
Bailey countered that the County will not participate in what he views as a one-sided business case and accused Davis of focusing on territorial expansion rather than improving existing services. Bailey emphasized that the County remains committed to respectful, transparent dialogue but will resist any push toward amalgamation.
As tensions rise, the debate highlights deep divisions over governance and regional planning. Davis aims to present findings from the study by fall 2025, while Bailey stands firm in defending Brant’s independence.
With the debate intensifying, Bailey suggested involving Members of Provincial Parliament (MPPs) to weigh in on the amalgamation issue, emphasizing its potential role in upcoming elections. Residents are encouraged to contact their representatives to express their views.
For now, the future of the two municipalities appears uncertain, with neither side showing signs of backing down.
